Elder Blunck,
We have in our stake a “feminist” who has long advocated for women to receive the priesthood. Over the past two years, (Name) has been encouraged by the measures and messages of President Nelson that have given women much more of a say and role, such as serving as witnesses in ordinances. Jennifer has been vocal about how pleased she is with the policy changes in the Church.
I have met with Jennifer multiple times trying to understand her feelings and to address what I could—such as asking bishoprics not to say, “We thank the priesthood for administering the sacrament” reminding them, as we’ve been reminded by Presidents Nelson, Oaks and Ballard, that priesthood is a power and authority, not men; suggesting that men are special over women.
Even with the encouraging changes, (Name) has distanced herself from the church and divorced her husband, who also has found fault with priesthood leaders and doctrine.
I just happened to see the message below that (Name) posted on Facebook last Sunday. I support the direction to allow those who hold the priesthood (with a current temple recommend) to administer the sacrament in their home. It is a true blessing in our home with our daughter and her three children living with us. On the other hand, it shines a spotlight on the painful reality that some will and some won’t get the sacrament each Sunday.
Here’s what (Name) wrote on Facebook (she has very little readership, only 41 followers) and has had no response to this FB post:
Religious post ahead. Be warned.
I've long believed that the LDS church needs to correct the sexism that exists in its leadership and organization. In the last couple of years, I've been surprised but pleased to see the Church finally begin to address and correct some of these inequities. I've always felt the easiest way to correct this was to simply give women the priesthood, but I have never expected a miracle. Changing long standing beliefs is just too mind blowing for so many people. I'm hoping the Church leaders are now seeing the need for women to hold the priesthood. It is utterly ridiculous that women like myself and my mother can not take the sacrament. My sisters can take the sacrament because they have active, priesthood holding husbands. My daughter can because she's in the same situation. I've been told over and over that priesthood blessings are available to all members regardless of their gender. I think current conditions have proved that this is not true. Can anyone truly think that the Church will somehow be less if women can do more?
I’m wondering if it might be prudent, so that no one feels left out or discriminated against, to declare Easter Sunday as “sacrament Sunday” for everyone and that be our only Sunday in April in which the sacrament is to be administered in homes. Unfortunately, it would require some ministering brothers to leave their families on Easter Sunday to administer the sacrament in the homes of others.
Please know I fully support whatever direction you and/or the Area Presidency want to give us, but know that I pain for those who feel they’re been discriminated against or left out because of this practice. On the other hand, I would also pain for the families that could have had the sacrament in their home, but can’t because of one woman complained.
I hope this is helpful in your future planning. We are grateful for your leadership and sensitivity.
Crismon Lewis
President, Mount Hood Stake