Paul,
Thank you so much for explaining what happened and for not holding ill will toward your aging, forgetful stake president.
I’ll certainly try to do better in explaining myself and not make assignments without establishing some dialogue and accountability.
What would help me greatly, inasmuch as I’m not always writing down the assignments I make, is if after a meeting…and you’ve been given an assignment that will take some pondering and maybe even research (not a simple go-and-do assignment) that you email me with something like: “As I understand it, you’ve assigned me to do such and such. This is the direction I plan to take in fulfilling this assignment. Is this the direction you want me to take?”
That would help me greatly and also hopefully eliminate the misunderstandings I’ve been creating lately.
I appreciate so much your desire to lift my load and move forward the work in your most important area of responsibility.
Gratefully,
Crismon
No problem President. There are no ill feelings on my part whatsoever. I am just trying to understand better my assignments and fulfill them in helping our stake leaders support and train ward leaders. We can certainly wait on this training.My primary concern is that when you give me an assignment(we were discussing what topics to train HCs on this upcoming Sunday and in the future months), I understood you directly gave me a charge to come up with a topic for this Sunday. To help me better fulfill this assignment it would help me immensely if you would be specific in what training you are thinking about at the time, if you do have something in mind, i. e. Ministering interviews. That would help me focus my attention on what you feel most important and suggest training around that topic. Or, if you have a topic already and want to draw from the recent leadership training video let me know that and I am happy to follow that direction. I know there are many times you receive inspiration or subsequently feel strongly about a topic after you have already given assignment and I understand that. However, as specific as you can be with your direction and what you are hoping the training will cover would assist me in my endeavors so I can be on the same page as you. Thanks President!PaulPaul,I can see now I changed course here on you. My apologies. It was a horrible oversight on my part.In my mind, the welfare element of the assignment was to focus on how can we help EQ/RS presidents (or presidencies) help the bishops find ways for welfare recipients to serve. That is a major missing element in our welfare assistance.I would appreciate training, maybe even use the HC to help create a list of service opportunities for welfare recipients. My hope is that we could show such a list to the bishops and assure them that the EQ/RS have been trained on how to oversee this part of the welfare procedure to give him confidence that as soon as he authorizes welfare assistance he assigns the recipient to work with the EQ / RS president to arrange for ways to serve as a way to show gratitude for the assistance received.That is the focus I wanted you to take. Obviously I failed in communicating that. Please forgive me.I appreciate that you would like to instruct the HC / EQ on all the welfare principles and program, but I would like us to focus on just that one element for now—it’s the missing piece in our stake.I agree we want to help offload welfare from the bishop to the EQ. I would like to see us try to make this transition as a first step in EQ/RS offloading the welfare—to give bishops something they can actually DO to move in this direction.Does that clarify the misunderstanding? Is that something you want to tackle this Sunday or give it some time to work on?Again, my apologies for my poor communication.Crismon